Do you really believe open adoption is confusing and abnormal?
ByI have read several answers today praising closed adoption, stating it leads to a “normal” childhood and doesn’t cause “confusion” as to who the parents are.
To those that agree with this thinking, do you think kids are confused when they have multiple grandparents, and multiple siblings, and multiple friends? Do you think the millions of kids in blended families with stepparents and half siblings are living abnormal and confusing lives? Don’t most kids adapt to whatever their “normal” is?
Blending first and adoptive families is really not much different than any other form of extended family, in my experience, so I am curious where these dire predictions of confusion come from.
Lillie, thanks for your response. The aim of open adoption is to address some of those issues, though of course like anything it may fail. My question is specifically to those who think closed adoption leads to less confusion and more normality than open.
Kateiska, on another question you answered: “I feel like I was able to have a more “normal” childhood than I might have if I had an open adoption.”
I forgot to mention, I am an adoptive mom, and we have an extended family type relationship with all members of our son’s first family. There seems to be no confusion in our family, so I asked the question.
Related posts:
- Does open adoption “water down” the adoptive parent’s relationship with the child?
- is the popularity of “open adoption” an indication that many first parents are ambivalent…?
- should potential birthparents be told that open adoption is not always legally enforceable???
- How concrete is an “open adoption” contract??
- Are you comfortable with an open adoption?


16 Comments
April 26th, 2010 at 1:46 pm
No, I think adoption itself is confusing and abnormal.
You can’t switch families willy-nilly and think that biological ties can just be erased by the signing of a document. People, human beings, are hard-wired to want to be with their kin. We look for similarities in physical structure, we want to have those same talents and abilities and likes and dislikes as our family members, we want to “fit in” as only relation can.
It’s the reason why millions of adopted people grow up to seek out their mothers and fathers and family. It’s not just simple “curiosity”, it’s human nature…and try as hard as you want to, you can never, ever erase that need to know and be accepted by one’s biological kin.
April 26th, 2010 at 2:44 pm
I haven’t read any answers or posted any answers saying that open adoption is “abnormal”, but I do read a lot of answers saying how terrible closed adoptions are and how horrible adoptive parents are. Gosh, someone wanted to give you a home and a family…yeah your life REALLY sucks..
I think all kinds of adoptions are great. I just personally believe that closed adoptions are more for me and my family and in my opinion my life wasn’t adversely affected by a closed adoption the way so many people seem the think such an adoption will affect you. I also don’t think that living in a blended family would be the same thing as being in an open adoption. I had a closed adoption and I am a part of a blended family. I wouldn’t compare that with what I imagine my life as if my adoption had been open. Of course I was born in Korea so an open adoption for me most likely could have never taken place. A lot of kids do adapt to whatever is normal for them, however in my opinion there was a good reason that the birth parents gave the child up for someone else to raise. I don’t believe you can still be a parent to a child you gave to someone else to raise because being a parent is more than just having a baby.
EDIT: Ladybmw what exactly is your point? Yes in my PERSONAL situation I was able to have a more “normal” childhood since my adoption was closed. I can’t speak for anyone else’s situation but my own. I am internationally adopted from a country where I do not know the language. When I was young we traveled a lot since my father was in the military and in my PERSONAL experience life was dramatic enough without having an open adoption that would have added chaos and drama especially since I can’t speak the language, don’t know the customs, and have a lot of extended family and family drama as it is. I was a product of an affair. Neither of my birth parents wanted me. Do you think it would be normal or healthy for a small child to have the parents in her life that looked like her (the only asian adults I would have been connected to at the time) that did not want her? I actually think that could have created some issues. I never said that it was “abnormal” at all and in my experience closed adoptions were best for me. That’s my opinion and you can pretty much take it or leave it. Thanks.
I also wanted to add that the reason I put the word normal in quotation marks when I used it to describe my own life and situation is because I understand that the word normal is subjective. I was using it to describe what was normal for me.
April 26th, 2010 at 2:53 pm
I’m tempted to say no, but there have been cases where the child gets confused. I myself couldn’t have been in an open adoption as I was adopted overseas.
So… possibly?
Depends on the child’s emotional maturity and how well the concept of “adoption” is explained to them as they grow up.
April 26th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
I will be blunt and real……as a potential adoptive mother i consider closed adoption mostly for my benefit of not having to “deal” witht hte real paretns….and also b/c adoption is usually to start your “Own” family….not to gain another family…..sorry i know how this sounds and thats why i am considerring both open and closed adoptions….after reading some posts from actual adoptees…..i realize i want the best option for my child not for me.
April 26th, 2010 at 3:38 pm
Yes. Children need to bond with the real parents who raise them. I can’t see how this is healthy.
April 26th, 2010 at 3:44 pm
I wish that we could have had an open adoption. It is hard to heal a relationship when one person is absent. I do think that my son would have been better off keeping his mum in his life.
However, the courts deemed it dangerous, as his father is a violent man and mum would not give up her relationship with her abuser in order to keep her kids (he was also her drug connection).
If I found out today that she was no longer doing drugs and that dad was now out of the picture, I would consider opening the adoption.
Even now we live with the threat that dad might find out where the kids are and hurt us (yes he is that violent) especially now that he is no longer incarcerated. However, I have been assured that mom will give no info about us to him as she wants us all to be safe.
April 26th, 2010 at 4:43 pm
sharla…thank you for your honesty…
————————-
closed adoption (absent of abuse or neglect) only benefits those who want to deny that their child is due to another woman, who endured what they could not. also, it’s an attempt to erase the first family…in a word, it’s selfish.
it is no more confusing then any other blended family.
April 26th, 2010 at 5:22 pm
Dear LadyBMW1,
I do think adoption itself is confusing and abnormal, totally agree with Lillie.
Open adoption is a way to help deal with this confusion and hopefully help the child feel less abnormal. There is a tangible set of biological parents that love and adore the child too. When all four parents of an adoptee come together and work together for the best interests of the child, how could it be wrong?
more family to love……..i still see more good than bad in open adoptions.
I applaud you for honoring an open adoption. Best wishes.
April 26th, 2010 at 5:37 pm
Like kateiskate said – “normal” is subjective. My “normal” was closed too.
If you have an open adoption and have known your bio family and your adoptive family and known what role everyone plays since day one, that is your “normal”.
I can see where it would be confusing to a child who has already spent some time being brought up in one family and then moved into another. With time and cooperation from all parties involved, I think children can grasp the concept. It just has to be at the child’s pace, not everyone else’s.
April 26th, 2010 at 6:34 pm
I think what would be more confusing would be to live a life of secrets, only to find out that the people you trusted, hid something HUGE from you. Talk about confused!
Open adoption may be awkward, but if it is handled in the correct manner, may be better for everyone involved. Notice, I say “may”. I understand that open adoption is not always possible, however, I do feel communication is key, and if there is any information to offer to adoptees, it should be forwarded to them (at an age appropriate time of course).
April 26th, 2010 at 7:20 pm
We are quite a blended family. My husband has 2 children from a previous marriage, we have 2 adopted daughters, and 1 biological child together. We are also in an open adoption with our oldest daughter’s family. It’s not confusing to her, it is just what she knows. I am so thankful that she will never have to wonder about her heritage, her looks, her likes/dislikes, and especially her medical history. Her adoption didn’t scar one family to help another, it joined two families together forever. We are blessed.
April 26th, 2010 at 8:08 pm
Our adoption is open and closed. It is closed to the children. They were adopted as older children, and knew their parents, but due to abuse and neglect the parents are NOT allowed to see them for a very long time; however, I offered to meet with them myself annually to share pictures, see how they are doing, and keep that contact and a journal for when my children are older and want to initiate contact.
But my kids were older so that maybe is different, but if I had adopted a child from birth, I could not imagine hvaing it closed where I shared no info with my child, or tried to keep things “normal”, when in fact being adopted is a different way to form a family than birth, and some things will be different. If done right, I think we can avoild harm to the children if we keep informaiton open, and let them be who they are and feel how they feel and support them in any way we can.
April 26th, 2010 at 8:15 pm
I think open adoption can work in some cases. I think it has to be a case by case type of decision. My sis in law and husband adopted three siblings, and it was open for quite a while. Unfortunately, that created alot of problems for the children, and they stopped wanting to go to their first family for visits. Their birth mom was a prostitute, and all kids were products of her job. She was not stable, and the kids would act up every time they came back from a visit. Needless to say, this particular time, it was better to sever the ties for the kids’ sake. They have all adjusted well, several years later.
April 26th, 2010 at 8:22 pm
I kind of think of open adoption alon the same lines of divorced parents. Just because I am divorced from my ex does not mean he does not have a right to have a relationship with our children. Actually the judge mandated it when he ordered that we have joint legal and physical custody. It is only abnormal to the kids if we as parents make it that way. Kids are pretty resilient and adjust alot better than adults do.
The same can be said about open adoption. If this is all the child knows it becomes a normal part of life. And I just don’t see how a child can be harmed by having two sets of parents that love them.
April 26th, 2010 at 9:16 pm
I think it is way abnormal to have an open adoption, Mine was closed, (so I guess that’s why I cant fully grasp this idea). I knew that when I was older I could meet my BM if I wanted to. I was never forced to grow up with my BM always around. I believe that if that was the case I would have been asking why my BM didn’t just take care of me her self? If a birth mom can talk with the child everyday and see the child when she wants to then what was the point of the adoption? I wonder if any one else sees it as the adoptive parents just paying and raising the kid while the birth mother or father gets to stand by and still be a parent but with out any expectations and responsibility’s of acting as one?
April 26th, 2010 at 9:39 pm
I personally think open adoption is a good idea- to an extent. Ultimately, I think that it should be the adoptees choice on whether or not they want to meet their biologicals. I had an open adoption have known my bmom my whole life. I only saw her at christmas and my birthdays, but it was healthy for both of us to meet up every once and a while. My bdad came in contact with my mom about two years ago, and it was my choice on whether or not i wanted to meet him. At the time, i didnt want to for personal reasons, but eventually i did, and since the optioin was there, i took it. Now i know both my bparents, but I only contact them when I want to.
Also, its relieving for me to know where I got some of my traits from and have access to family medical history.
Open adoption works best when the adoptee gets to decide who and when they meet.