<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For moms who have been through both: Which was better for you,
natural childbirth or a C-section?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepregnantnews.com/birthing-techniques/natural-childbirth/for-moms-who-have-been-through-both-which-was-better-for-younatural-childbirth-or-a-c-section/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/birthing-techniques/natural-childbirth/for-moms-who-have-been-through-both-which-was-better-for-younatural-childbirth-or-a-c-section</link>
	<description>Resources for the new and expectant mother.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:10:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/birthing-techniques/natural-childbirth/for-moms-who-have-been-through-both-which-was-better-for-younatural-childbirth-or-a-c-section/comment-page-1#comment-6009</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepregnantnews.com/birthing-techniques/natural-childbirth/for-moms-who-have-been-through-both-which-was-better-for-younatural-childbirth-or-a-c-section#comment-6009</guid>
		<description>I had a natural birth with my first, csection with 2nd and VBAC with my 3rd.  My natural births were much easier, less painful, faster recovery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a natural birth with my first, csection with 2nd and VBAC with my 3rd.  My natural births were much easier, less painful, faster recovery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meagan G</title>
		<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/birthing-techniques/natural-childbirth/for-moms-who-have-been-through-both-which-was-better-for-younatural-childbirth-or-a-c-section/comment-page-1#comment-6008</link>
		<dc:creator>Meagan G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepregnantnews.com/birthing-techniques/natural-childbirth/for-moms-who-have-been-through-both-which-was-better-for-younatural-childbirth-or-a-c-section#comment-6008</guid>
		<description>My mom had a natural with me, and a C-Section with my sister, and she said that she much rather preferred natural because the pain from the healing scar lasts weeks longer than a sore something else. Natural does last longer, but its better in the end if its an option for you, because unless something is wrong or you had a previous C-section because of complications, you don&#039;t have a choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My mom had a natural with me, and a C-Section with my sister, and she said that she much rather preferred natural because the pain from the healing scar lasts weeks longer than a sore something else. Natural does last longer, but its better in the end if its an option for you, because unless something is wrong or you had a previous C-section because of complications, you don&#8217;t have a choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

