<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has anyone ever had a successful pregnancy with damaged fallopian
tubes and without using IVF?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf</link>
	<description>Resources for the new and expectant mother.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:10:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doodlestuff</title>
		<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf/comment-page-1#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodlestuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>Yes, you can get pregnant. Yes, you are more likely to have a tubal pregnancy.  IVF was made for folks like you.  Don&#039;t put it off too long - you are more likely to be successful the younger you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can get pregnant. Yes, you are more likely to have a tubal pregnancy.  IVF was made for folks like you.  Don&#8217;t put it off too long &#8211; you are more likely to be successful the younger you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MurphysGirl</title>
		<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf/comment-page-1#comment-3061</link>
		<dc:creator>MurphysGirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf#comment-3061</guid>
		<description>I had a fallopian tube removed last year and the other one was partially damaged. We went ahead against my Dr&#039;s. advice and continued to try and become pregnant. After my second IUI we conceived. But because my only tube was partially damaged it ended up being a tubal pregnancy w/ twins. I lost my only remaining fallopian tube. In Sept we started IVF. I was very wary of IVF - scared, worried, etc... but we ahead knowing it was a 50/50 chance. We became pregnant. I am now 5 weeks pregnant after losing both my fallopian tubes. 
IVF was invented or used  in the beginning for women with tubal issues. For me, I had hydrosalpinx of the fallopian tubes meaning there was absolutely no way to go except IVF. But I was stubborn and wanted to keep even the partially damaged tube AND we did conceived via IUI, femara, and injectables. BUT I never thought ahead far enough to think of a tubal pregnancy due the abnormalities of the tube. 
I wish you luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a fallopian tube removed last year and the other one was partially damaged. We went ahead against my Dr&#8217;s. advice and continued to try and become pregnant. After my second IUI we conceived. But because my only tube was partially damaged it ended up being a tubal pregnancy w/ twins. I lost my only remaining fallopian tube. In Sept we started IVF. I was very wary of IVF &#8211; scared, worried, etc&#8230; but we ahead knowing it was a 50/50 chance. We became pregnant. I am now 5 weeks pregnant after losing both my fallopian tubes.<br />
IVF was invented or used  in the beginning for women with tubal issues. For me, I had hydrosalpinx of the fallopian tubes meaning there was absolutely no way to go except IVF. But I was stubborn and wanted to keep even the partially damaged tube AND we did conceived via IUI, femara, and injectables. BUT I never thought ahead far enough to think of a tubal pregnancy due the abnormalities of the tube.<br />
I wish you luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hulahoop (due 28/06/2010)</title>
		<link>http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf/comment-page-1#comment-3060</link>
		<dc:creator>hulahoop (due 28/06/2010)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 04:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thepregnantnews.com/labor/has-anyone-ever-had-a-successful-pregnancy-with-damaged-fallopiantubes-and-without-using-ivf#comment-3060</guid>
		<description>Tubal infertility can sometimes be treated by surgery, but if this is not possible, or if surgery is unsuccessful, IVF may be the solution. Tubal surgery is a major procedure involving a general anaesthetic and often lasts for several hours. The operation is usually carried out with the aid of an operating microscope. Surgery is successful in about 45% of patients when the obstruction is at the uterine end of the tubes, but only in 20-25% when obstruction is at the fimbrial ends of the tubes, closest to the ovaries. After most types of tubal surgery, there is an increased risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tubal infertility can sometimes be treated by surgery, but if this is not possible, or if surgery is unsuccessful, IVF may be the solution. Tubal surgery is a major procedure involving a general anaesthetic and often lasts for several hours. The operation is usually carried out with the aid of an operating microscope. Surgery is successful in about 45% of patients when the obstruction is at the uterine end of the tubes, but only in 20-25% when obstruction is at the fimbrial ends of the tubes, closest to the ovaries. After most types of tubal surgery, there is an increased risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

